Got a call from a friend having issues with certain broker-led syndicates. The broker made a killing but leaving those who brought in dry and sorry.
Why do brokers often get a bad rap? Often they put themselves first and not put their client first. You call and they told you to look at the property on your own. They put up signs but never filled the flyer box for the client they represent. They don't hold open house or go out market or show properties. No wonder the property just sit on the market for 3 months, for 6 months, and on and on. Are they doing justice to the owner that gave them the listing?
Same thing can be said with fund raisers or investment bankers. They bring you in to an investment and once they make their lucrative sum of money, they are out first leaving you dry. Misalignment of interest is everywhere.
It's funny though in all real-estate, mortgage, and stock broker/dealer licensing that it is specified that they DO HAVE A FIDUCIARY to act in the best interest of their client.
Now, I know a good broker in Missouri that did everything possible including fixing things up to get a property bought. I know a good broker in Alabama that's working hard through title problems trying to help us sell. There's plenty of good broker.
So I don’t think it’s the broker job per se, there are good broker and bad brokers just as there are good owner and bad owner. I believe it’s in attitude. Do you have a bad "broker" attitude or good "owner" attidude?
Here are some of the tests you can do to find out if you are using an investment broker:
1. find out if they themselves put any money in (
are they at risk)
2. fidn out if they
have an advantage over you (do they honestly disclose it first)
3 find ou if things go bad, are they first one out (
are we on the same boat? do you try to make an effort to get their client out first and them next?)
4. find out in the event of
conflict of interest, how they would work: would they put their self interest first or their fiduciary interest first
Now, in line of "be-do-have", let’s contrast the self-interested “broker” attitude with the
good “owner” attitude below:
"
While we cannot promise your results, but can guarantee that your financial fortunes will move in lockstep with ours for whatever period of time you elect to be our partner. We have no interest in gaining an “edge” over you. We want to make money only when our partners do and in exactly the same proportion. Moreover, when we do something dumb, I want you to be able to derive some solace from the fact that our financial suffering is proportional to yours"
How do you like that? Do you see the difference? We all will have our ups and down (some worse than others), but isn’t it wonderful to have someone with that kind of philosophy being your broker, manager, and manager?
That’s what we are looking for and what we strive to emulate. Again attitude & competence both are necessary. I know at one time I may have good attitude but not competence and competence but not good attitude and they don't work. Need both.
Now bonus questions: who first said the above "owner/partner" paragraph?